CE
Chord Energy Corp (CHRD)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered strong operations: adjusted diluted EPS of $4.04 vs S&P consensus $3.54 (beat ~14%), adjusted EBITDA exceeded consensus, while revenue was slightly below consensus; GAAP diluted EPS was $3.66 as non-GAAP adjustments (derivatives, affiliate fair value, merger costs) lifted adjusted EPS .*
- Guidance tweaks: FY25 capex lowered by $30MM to $1.325–$1.415B, FY25 LOE range reduced to $9.20–$10.00/Boe, production taxes reduced, while cash interest raised to $65–$71MM due to March bond issuance and buybacks .
- Shareholder returns: 100% of adjusted free cash flow returned via buybacks after base dividend; $216.5MM repurchases in Q1 and ~$45MM more in April; leverage ~0.3x and liquidity ~$1.945B support continued repurchases .
- Operational catalysts: expansion of 4‑mile lateral program (7 planned), first well $1MM under budget; longer laterals expected to lower breakevens by $8–$12/bbl vs 2‑mile wells, supporting capital efficiency and margins .
- Stock reaction drivers: EPS/EBITDA beat, visible cost improvements (LOE), capital discipline (capex cut), and buyback focus; tempered by macro caution (bias to keep one frac crew if oil stays in the $50s), modest revenue shortfall vs consensus, and higher interest expense .*
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Oil volumes beat the high end of guidance (153.7 MBopd; total 270.9 MBoepd), with adjusted EBITDA $695.5MM and adjusted FCF $290.5MM; LOE at $9.56/Boe was below midpoint guidance .
- Capital efficiency: FY25 capex reduced by $30MM with unchanged volume guidance; LOE FY25 range lowered, reflecting operational improvements and efficiencies .
- Strategic progress: first 4‑mile TIL delivered under budget; 4‑mile program expanded (7 spuds planned), with early tracer data showing contribution across the entire lateral; management emphasized resilience and flexibility to moderate activity while maintaining FCF .
“We benefited from better than modeled well performance, solid cost control, and improved downtime, leading to strong oil production and free cash flow above expectations.” — CEO Danny Brown .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue vs consensus: S&P revenue consensus of ~$1.18B vs S&P-reported actual ~$1.14B (company-reported oil/NGL/gas revenue $1.103B), a modest miss amid pricing/differentials; GAAP EPS below adjusted due to derivative and other non-cash items .*
- Macro deterioration: bias to keep one frac crew through year-end if oil stays with a “5 handle,” implying lower 4Q TIL cadence and downshift in oil volumes into Q4 absent a second crew .
- Interest expense and taxes: cash interest guidance increased on new 2033 notes and buybacks; Q1 production taxes were unusually low (6.8%) due to a nonrecurring stripper-well refund and higher gas mix, with normalization to ~8.5% expected for the rest of the year .
Financial Results
Results vs Prior Periods and Estimates
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Margin Trend
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Revenue Mix
KPIs and Operating Metrics
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Share repurchases comprised the entirety of returns after the base dividend, and we expect continued focus on share repurchases going forward.” — CEO Danny Brown .
- “At current strip prices, we are inclined to maintain 1 frac crew instead of reinstating the second near year‑end… production impact to 2025 would be negligible; 4Q capital would be much lower.” — CEO Danny Brown .
- “Oil differentials averaged $2.30 below WTI… NGL realizations 20% of WTI; gas realizations 63% above top‑end of guidance; we anticipate gas prices to soften mid‑year before improving.” — CFO Richard Robuck .
Q&A Highlights
- Activity/Capital Allocation: With oil in the $50s, the default would be one simul‑frac fleet into 2026; reinstatement of the second crew requires “oil firmly in the 60s” and favorable capital allocation vs buybacks .
- Oil cadence: Expect flattish 3Q vs 2Q and downshift into 4Q due to fewer TILs unless second frac crew returns late‑year .
- 4‑mile program rollout: Operational results better than expected; lower torque/drag; cleaning in one run; plan to move swiftly to higher share of long laterals as re‑permitting progresses .
- LOE/Marketing self‑help: Vendor cost reductions, improved run times on legacy Enerplus wells, consolidation of contracts to better rates .
- Hedging posture: ≤40% prompt quarter, hedge more at higher prices; balance sheet resiliency is the “great hedge” against cyclicality .
- Portfolio: Marcellus core to the basin but non‑core to Chord; will maximize value over time; Williston M&A challenged by price volatility (bid/ask spread) .
Estimates Context
- EPS: Adjusted diluted EPS $4.04 vs S&P consensus $3.54 — beat (~+$0.50, ~14%) driven by stronger oil volumes, cost control, and lower LOE; GAAP diluted EPS $3.66 reflects non‑GAAP adjustments (derivatives, affiliate fair value, merger costs) .*
- Revenue: S&P revenue consensus ~$$1.18B vs S&P actual ~$1.14B (company-reported oil/NGL/gas revenue $1.103B); a modest miss, with realizations and differentials consistent with guidance ranges .*
- EBITDA: S&P EBITDA consensus ~$648MM vs S&P actual ~$667MM (company adjusted EBITDA $695.5MM); operational outperformance and favorable gas/NGL realizations contributed .*
- Implications: Street may raise EBITDA/FCF estimates modestly and lower FY25 LOE/capex assumptions; expect production taxes to normalize higher from Q1’s refund, and cash interest higher post 2033 notes .*
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- EPS/EBITDA beat with tightening cost guidance (LOE, capex) and strong liquidity suggests resilient FCF even at lower prices; buybacks likely remain the dominant return lever near‑term .
- Management bias to keep one frac crew if oil remains in the $50s implies lower 4Q capital and wedge volumes — a defensive posture that preserves inventory and ROCE .
- 4‑mile lateral expansion is a structural positive: lower breakevens ($8–$12/bbl vs 2‑mile), improved capital productivity/margins, and potential inventory “re‑rating” over time .
- Watch cash interest and production taxes: interest guide up ($65–$71MM) post notes; production taxes should revert to ~8.5% for the year after Q1’s refund-driven dip .
- Gas/NGL realizations benefited from seasonality; expect mid‑year softening before year‑end improvement — monitor realizations and midstream optionality efforts (dual/split connections) .
- Liquidity (~$1.945B) and leverage (~0.3x) enable opportunistic repurchases/M&A; Marcellus remains a non‑core monetization candidate; Williston M&A could be slower amid price volatility .
- Near‑term trading lens: focus on buyback cadence, 2Q/3Q oil volumes vs guide, and any Q3 decision on reinstating the second frac crew as catalysts for sentiment and estimate revisions .
Notes:
- Company Q1 press release and 8‑K (Item 2.02) furnish full financials and reconciliations; adjusted metrics reflect non‑GAAP definitions (derivatives, affiliate changes, merger costs, etc.) .
- Debt actions: $750MM 6.75% senior notes due 2033 (par) priced March 3; concurrent cash tender for 6.375% 2026 notes — supports higher cash interest guidance and improved liquidity profile .